>Chicago Feb. 7 Lake Effect Snow Assessment

>This Chicago lake effect snow was unprecedented. I had not predicted this, and the models hadn’t either.

Looking at the last 4 runs of the GFS, only on the 12z run (3rd run out of 4) did the GFS pick up on the lake effect snows. By then, it was approximately noon CDT, and got a solid handle on it at about the same time.
Looking at this, the GFS obviously didn’t perform well.
The NAM got a solid handle on the snows at 12z as well, and the NAM latched onto GFS thinking that the lake effect snows would hit Chicago at the 12z run.
The SREF, which typically is the best in short-hand situations, always had a thinking that lake effect snows would occur in SE Wisconsin, but never got the feeling for it hitting Chicago until it was happening.
In conclusion, the models did not handle this well at all, and the rating I would give the models a rating of a D+.
Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s